| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140102 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 18 '19 at 22:50 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 67% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67%
Good
|
68% 111 Pts
|
36% 269 Pts
|
17% 271 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4170
|
3.26%
Terrible
|
3% 4.37 fps
|
4% 4.71 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 81 27 28 29 25 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
54% 242 MB/s
|
122% 42.9 MB/s
|
115% 238 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 500GB (2012)
154GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 93 96 96 97 MB/s
|
52.4%
Above average
|
64% 86.2 MB/s
|
179% 1.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
27%
Poor
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
22% 7.77 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,992 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 458x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 296x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 223x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 299x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 201x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 172x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $297 |