Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180928
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '19 at 22:08
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	19%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 186 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 434 42% 344 Pts	64-Core 383 24% 383 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 10C1) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Lighting 34 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 31.1 28% 30.3 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 32.9 Splatting 23 24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1348 305 306 303 305 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,579 Write 1,436 Mixed 998 SusWrite 478 251% 1,123 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 98.4 4K Mixed 56.1 190% 66 MB/s	DQ Read 936 DQ Write 780 DQ Mixed 838 633% 851 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 280%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 853GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 126 128 130 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 12 Write 52.2 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 127 37% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0 20% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 79%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.2 8.1 8.1 7.7 8.2 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	5.28% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 8 10% 8.05 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.28% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB 96,646 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 11.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,692x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	920x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,555x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,056x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	324x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	874x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	220x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16