Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Memory 76.5 1-Core 151 2-Core 304 94% 177 Pts	4-Core 601 8-Core 1,196 106% 899 Pts	64-Core 2,194 136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 114 Parallax 97.1 92% 108 fps	MRender 98.1 Gravity 101 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 275 276 275 276 276 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 455 Mixed 354 SusWrite 288 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 51.5 173% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 158 131% 189 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 118%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 40GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 103 98 103 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 494 Write 103 Mixed 158 SusWrite 101 46% 214 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 15.2 101% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 83.2 DQ Mixed 28.7 43% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 65%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 9GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 497 Write 454 Mixed 372 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 87.6 4K Mixed 51.1 174% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 161 133% 191 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 184GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 52 52 53 48 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 15.7 Write 30 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 51.5 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.1 43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 57%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 73GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 56 65 64 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 73.3 Write 43.7 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 61.3 44% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 389GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 114 116 118 117 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 116 Write 80.8 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 115 72% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 2x16GB 9,626 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88.1% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 31.9 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 29.9 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	398x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	381x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	333x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	271x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	151x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	144x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	171x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	115x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	71x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	121x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	67x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,613

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16