Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 17:46
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 132
59% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 222
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1410 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 86.3
60% 74.3 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 80.3
58% 69.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 157 155 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 438
Mixed 380
SusWrite 180
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 50.5
170% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 235
177% 236 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 115%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
183GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 205 203 202 206 204 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 329
Write 209
Mixed 233
SusWrite 209
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 27.1
105% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 158
128% 180 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
322GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 109
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
771GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 104 101 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 180
Write 165
Mixed 110
SusWrite 102
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
201GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 147 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 146
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-8GTX 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 18.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback