Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L850-18Z (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120620
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '19 at 15:27
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 54.3 33% 48.8 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 285 26% 220 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670M 910 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.151.0.0 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.25% Terrible	Lighting 6.63 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 5.31 5% 6.15 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 7.17 5% 5.89 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.25% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB 4,257 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0422C SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 85 75 76 74 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 307 Write 277 Mixed 160 SusWrite 102 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 21.3 67% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 67.9 117% 227 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KSN-4G Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	46.2% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.4 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16