Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 83% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 91.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 249 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 800 77% 633 Pts	64-Core 973 60% 973 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.2 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 25.3 Reflection 27 Parallax 38.4 21% 30.2 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 30.1 Splatting 27.1 26% 32 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 1423 1402 1406 1392 1370 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 1,837 Write 1,466 Mixed 592 SusWrite 1,386 295% 1,320 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 59.1 207% 74.9 MB/s	DQ Read 929 DQ Write 634 DQ Mixed 800 592% 788 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 306%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 188GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 455 459 459 459 459 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 448 Write 435 Mixed 343 SusWrite 458 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 88.3 4K Mixed 41.8 150% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 348 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 281GB free Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 146 145 145 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 144 Write 111 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 146 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CRC 8x4GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 43 MC Write 53 MC Mixed 43.8 133% 46.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 20.6 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 145%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	739x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	375x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	182x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16