Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-A  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 09:23
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 848
88% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1550 MHz, MLim: 2010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 73
Parallax 58.4
32% 56.9 fps
MRender 0.05
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 60.5
31% 34.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,956
Write 6,208
Mixed 7,477
1,746% 7,880 MB/s
4K Read 627
4K Write 335
4K Mixed 391
1,628% 451 MB/s
DQ Read 1,676
DQ Write 1,228
DQ Mixed 1,311
1,018% 1,405 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 170 172 175 172 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 166
Mixed 84
SusWrite 173
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
13GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 13 11 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 128
Write 34.7
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 15.4
65% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.8
240% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
27GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 142
Write 92.2
Mixed 31.8
98% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.8
144% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 36%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
990GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 37
Write 39.8
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 39.7
52% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 35.4
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 36.4
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $692
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback