| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus Z170M-PLUS/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160303 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 18 '19 at 01:35 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.6%
Good
|
66% 116 Pts
|
42% 316 Pts
|
21% 341 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 3FC9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
82.4%
Excellent
|
84% 101 fps
|
78% 98.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$175
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 342 359 375 378 352 MB/s
|
119%
Outstanding
|
141% 624 MB/s
|
117% 42.9 MB/s
|
563% 758 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
349GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 141 139 140 146 145 MB/s
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
92% 126 MB/s
|
127% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1913 MHz
|
47.9%
Average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
43% 92.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z170M-PLUS/BR Builds (Compare 160 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 30x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 28x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 24x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $265 |