Asus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Memory 100 1-Core 166 2-Core 331 108% 199 Pts	4-Core 660 8-Core 922 100% 791 Pts	64-Core 923 57% 923 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 3015 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.5% Excellent	Lighting 100 Reflection 115 Parallax 93.8 82% 103 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 100 Splatting 125 96% 116 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S2G 128GB 499 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.03 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 521 Write 466 Mixed 429 105% 472 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 56 203% 77.9 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 248 212% 311 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 101%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 44GB free Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 102 89 118 126 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 464 Write 330 Mixed 280 SusWrite 134 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 19.2 86% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 86.5 DQ Mixed 39.9 47% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 13GB free Firmware: JPFOA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 43 Write 48.7 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 71.2 35% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3866 2x8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4200 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 56.7 MC Write 54 MC Mixed 39.3 143% 50 GB/s	SC Read 29.5 SC Write 55.7 SC Mixed 43.6 123% 42.9 GB/s	Latency 33.6 119% 33.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X APEX Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X APEX

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	176x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	54x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	71x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	17x
Titan X PascalNvidia $286Bench 121%, 8,692 samples	16x

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	17x
860 Pro 1TBSamsung $300Bench 112%, 8,179 samples	15x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	11x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	27x
CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 17,500 samples	16x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 91%, 1,151 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $883

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16