Lenovo 81D2

Performance Results

Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 81D2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory16.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '19 at 20:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 37.4
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 128
44% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 402
40% 317 Pts
64-Core 445
30% 445 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Legend(17AA 38EF) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver:
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 22.8
4% 18.1 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 15.9
4% 13.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 12%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$211
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 320 342 333 350 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 411
Write 350
Mixed 339
SusWrite 336
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 21.7
70% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 139
107% 147 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 81D2 Builds (Compare 739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 56%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81D2

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $328Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback