Performance Results


Gaming 160% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 143% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B77
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190614
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	Memory 89.5 1-Core 154 2-Core 298 98% 181 Pts	4-Core 592 8-Core 829 89% 711 Pts	64-Core 1,091 68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	160% Outstanding	Lighting 225 Reflection 218 Parallax 234 183% 226 fps	MRender 253 Gravity 220 Splatting 134 158% 202 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 378GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 754 657 655 655 654 657 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	301% Outstanding	Read 2,576 Write 2,370 Mixed 1,522 SusWrite 672 398% 1785 MB/s	4K Read 68.9 4K Write 190 4K Mixed 95.4 327% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,383 DQ Write 1,108 DQ Mixed 1209 915% 1,233 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 301% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 492GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1213 1251 1252 1199 1157 1159 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	285% Outstanding	Read 1,418 Write 1,242 Mixed 1,196 SusWrite 1,205 285% 1,265 MB/s	4K Read 66.7 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 91.2 307% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,470 DQ Write 1,218 DQ Mixed 899 795% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 285% Great: 372%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 28GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 20 19 19 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 24 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 18 26% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 73% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 4x8GB 3,931 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	98.9% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 39.4 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 26.6 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 35.6 84% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	27x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	11x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	11x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	10x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	10x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $851

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16