| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150723 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 17 '19 at 18:23 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
40.7%
Average
|
40% 61.8 Pts
|
11% 79.6 Pts
|
5% 79.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Gigabyte(1458 344C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
1.38%
Terrible
|
1% 1.58 fps
|
2% 2.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 83 98 45 69 56 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
32% 140 MB/s
|
78% 25.4 MB/s
|
23% 33.1 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
298GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 60 60 60 60 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
39% 53.1 MB/s
|
111% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.7%
Very poor
|
18% 6.27 GB/s
|
17% 5.8 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 30x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 13x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $197 |