| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK FX505GD |
| Memory | 27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190531 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 17 '19 at 15:24 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
65.9%
Good
|
59% 96.8 Pts
|
43% 355 Pts
|
35% 564 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 13B1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
8% 11.8 fps
|
19% 23 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1136 587 592 599 591 596 MB/s
|
163%
Outstanding
|
284% 1,253 MB/s
|
156% 53.6 MB/s
|
464% 623 MB/s
|
|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
928GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 386 362 361 389 426 MB/s
|
95.1%
Outstanding
|
89% 398 MB/s
|
124% 41.9 MB/s
|
223% 313 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
78.9%
Very good
|
84% 29.4 GB/s
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
52% 77.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD Builds (Compare 741 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples | 467x |
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 274x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 413x |
| GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples | 328x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |