Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570T 7,298 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 83.9 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 148 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 194 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 30A3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.46% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 5.77 Parallax 4.75 3% 4.76 fps	MRender 6.62 Gravity 2.07 Splatting 6.43 4% 5.04 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB 5,980 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT06L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 125 130 130 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 453 Write 138 Mixed 144 SusWrite 128 47% 216 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 21.6 93% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 66.1 96% 184 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 79%
OCZ-VERT EX3 LP 240GB 182GB free, PID 0888 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 207 209 209 213 213 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	157% Outstanding	Read 216 Write 215 Mixed 190 SusWrite 209 283% 208 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 20.5 1,603% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 22.7 1,756% 23.6 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-401.A00LF 9905428-417.A00LF 16GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.8 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 19.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16