HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '19 at 11:00
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 153 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 204 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 7.19 Parallax 1.66 0% 2.97 fps	MRender 7.19 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 4.52 4% 5.06 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AJ10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 2.5 1.6 6.2 3.2 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	8.13% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 22.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 7.5 10% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 8.13% Great: 77%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 561GB free Firmware: 060E SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7.7 7.9 7.2 8.2 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.58% Terrible	Read 25 Write 19.5 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 7.8 14% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.58% Great: 66%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7 6.9 6.7 7.2 7 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Read 19 Write 7.2 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 6.9 11% 9.45 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 12%
SMI USB DISK 16GB 4,910 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 6.5 7 6.4 5.3 8.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 17.7 Write 3.7 Mixed 9 SusWrite 6.3 10% 9.18 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 35%
TDK LoR TF10 32GB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 29GB free, PID 0619 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.5 4.5 4.3 3.5 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.62% Terrible	Read 10 Write 3 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 4.1 7% 5.95 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 24% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.62% Great: 10%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 3,818 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 49GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.3 6.3 5.9 6.4 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.63% Terrible	Read 22 Write 7 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 5.9 13% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 57% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.63% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-G7 ID:85 9B CT25664BA160B.C16 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-G7 ID:85 9B CT25664BA160B.C16 44GB 1066, 1333, 1066, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.2% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	198x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	159x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	99x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	11x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	11x
ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:02 9E CM3X2G1600C8D ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 44GBUnknownBench 39%, 12 samples	11x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16