HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 26%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP Laptop 15-db0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84AC
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 17 '19 at 09:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 72.8
27% 56 Pts
4-Core 67.7
8-Core 69.1
9% 68.4 Pts
64-Core 90.8
6% 90.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 17%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
HP(103C 84AC) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 2.9
1% 3.67 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4.1
1% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-256G-1006 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 181 169 175 181 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 348
Write 240
Mixed 191
SusWrite 182
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 32.1
99% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 132
102% 142 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Laptop 15-db0xxx Builds (Compare 2,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 18%
Desktop 52%
Workstation 22%

System: HP Laptop 15-db0xxx

The Best.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback