Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181011
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '19 at 04:44
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 139 2-Core 269 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 608 65% 517 Pts	64-Core 586 36% 586 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design 1,537 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3064 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 26.9 Reflection 24 Parallax 28.5 22% 26.5 fps	MRender 32.8 Gravity 27.4 Splatting 21.1 22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 599 564 521 556 586 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	201% Outstanding	Read 532 Write 509 Mixed 458 SusWrite 549 116% 512 MB/s	4K Read 63.3 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 83.8 288% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,351 DQ Write 1,217 DQ Mixed 1,118 884% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 201% Great: 259%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 295GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 345 160 159 161 160 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 411 Mixed 309 SusWrite 205 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 46.2 171% 65.1 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 182 141% 198 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB 6,645 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 21.6 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 24.8 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	131x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	86x
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 21%, 1,537 samples	45x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	81x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	17x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 6,645 samples	131x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16