Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 19:55
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 146
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 432
42% 348 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 164
Parallax 198
91% 158 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 176
Splatting 121
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 319 327 280 249 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 318
Write 307
Mixed 253
SusWrite 285
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 27.6
88% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 74.5
89% 156 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 113%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
19GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 147
Write 59.8
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 58.5
19% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 17.7
66% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 77.9
DQ Write 61.7
DQ Mixed 36.7
36% 58.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 51%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
221GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 82 84 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 89.2
Write 70.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 84.4
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback