RM DESKTOP 310

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemRM DESKTOP 310  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 19:05
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.9% Below average
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 134
53% 109 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 275
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 310
21% 310 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.18
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 142
Reflection 117
Parallax 126
36% 128 fps
MRender 82.6
Gravity 123
Splatting 83.6
31% 96.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$86
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 284 290 293 292 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 194
Write 214
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 285
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 6.1
33% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 25
22% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 124%
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3 2.6 2.7 3.2 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 1.3
Mixed 2
SusWrite 2.7
5% 4.83 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical DESKTOP 310 Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: RM DESKTOP 310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $330
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback