Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 85.9 1-Core 69.1 2-Core 136 60% 96.9 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 390 38% 312 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	6.5% Terrible	Lighting 7.07 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 7.28 6% 8.4 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 10.9 8% 9.61 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.5% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pioneer APS-SL2 Serise 120GB 423 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 65 65 44 45 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 363 Write 268 Mixed 233 SusWrite 58.3 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 10.1 69% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 24.8 DQ Write 75.4 DQ Mixed 14.1 21% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 67%
Seagate ST3250312CS 250GB-$90 1,923 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 55GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 66 66 45 45 45 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 94.1 Write 96.6 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 58.9 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 15.6 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $465

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16