| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP HDX18 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Quanta 3610 |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101208 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 16 '19 at 10:51 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
17% 22.7 Pts
|
4% 28.8 Pts
|
2% 32.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 130M
HP(103C 3610) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
2.46%
Terrible
|
2% 2.97 fps
|
3% 3.46 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fujitsu MJA2500B 500GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8919
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.7 5.8 7.6 8.4 9.2 MB/s
|
6.46%
Terrible
|
10% 14 MB/s
|
38% 0.27 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
234GB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 23 36 32 28 33 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
20% 27.3 MB/s
|
102% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
13% 4.4 GB/s
|
7% 2.47 GB/s
|
16% 252 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical HDX18 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP HDX18 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo P8800Intel $40Bench 38%, 946 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $172Bench 46%, 660 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $130 |