Lenovo 20M90017GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20M90017GE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20M90017GE
Memory37.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 09:44
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 226
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 713
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Legend(17AA 225F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.21
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.2% Poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 27
Parallax 33.2
17% 27.1 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 37
Splatting 37.5
29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 225F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6346
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 7.47
6% 8.58 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 15.1
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 600 584 579 604 606 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,300
Write 1,862
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 645
338% 1,521 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 76.4
251% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 886
688% 943 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 253%
Great: 296%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
866GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2296 2157 1090 1085 1077 1090 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,476
Write 2,300
Mixed 1,603
SusWrite 1,466
440% 1,961 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 76.2
250% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,068
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 1,009
757% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 311%
Great: 372%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 118 119 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 167
Write 116
Mixed 81
SusWrite 118
154% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.8
282% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
2GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 4.4 4.7 4.9 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 11.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 5.4
20% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.2
151% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 9905703-008.A00G 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Kingston 9905703-008.A00G 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.1% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 24.9
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20M90017GE Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20M90017GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback