Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170 2,726 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 40.6 2-Core 68.7 40% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 74.3 8-Core 75.6 10% 74.9 Pts	64-Core 74.1 5% 74.1 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 30E7) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 4.78 2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 166 167 169 174 174 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.3% Above average	Read 234 Write 172 Mixed 181 SusWrite 154 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 31.2 103% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 142 107% 143 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples	9x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	8x
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	7x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples	42x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $55

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16