Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 08:17
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 264
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 782
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 7.69
19% 14 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 17.7
14% 17 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 248 243 239 236 234 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 472
Mixed 446
SusWrite 245
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 55.5
190% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 241
214% 322 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
440GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 165 163 154 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 135
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 165
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 175 177 174 172 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 94.7
Write 140
Mixed 70
SusWrite 174
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
203% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,035
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback