Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 3965U 329 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 49.9 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 99.2 43% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 115 16% 116 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610 9,913 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 506C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.88 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 4.17 2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000L1 128GB 430 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT24L0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 359 Write 318 Mixed 300 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 38.6 118% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 133 148% 252 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 1x4GB 1,356 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 9.6 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 3965UIntelBench 47%, 329 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	3x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 430 samples	3x

RAM
RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 1x4GBRamaxelBench 30%, 1,356 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16