TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 126
2-Core 243
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 935
85% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,304
81% 1,304 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 87.6%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1702 MHz, MLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 93.9
Parallax 204
91% 137 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 144
Splatting 132
102% 123 fps
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 94.9%
 Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 317 310 318 296 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 454
Mixed 448
SusWrite 325
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.4
195% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
870GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 443 425 440 424 440 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 441
Mixed 411
SusWrite 436
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.5
185% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 309
250% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 121%
 Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
459GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 160 166 156 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 161
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 161
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 93.5%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 32.9
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 30.3
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 105%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples1,173x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples747x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples642x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples322x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples282x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples225x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples207x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples146x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples132x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples357x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples203x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples167x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback