Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 19:27
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 243
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 708
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 144
Parallax 124
112% 135 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 129
Splatting 107
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
610GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 401 442 449 450 449 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 477
Write 441
Mixed 362
SusWrite 429
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 37.5
143% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 262
216% 312 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
379GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 261 277 283 286 285 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 370
Write 338
Mixed 325
SusWrite 275
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 44.6
148% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 283
213% 285 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
197GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 424 399 332 294 268 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 465
Mixed 388
SusWrite 356
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 54
182% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
626GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 242 241 242 244 243 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 293
Write 236
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 243
154% 213 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.6
451% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 154%
Great: 184%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
800GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 93.8
Mixed 32
47% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 108%
Jmicron H/W RAID1 1TB
135GB free
Firmware: 0958
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 96 95 98 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 87
Mixed 60
SusWrite 95.2
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 91%
WD WD1200BEVS-75LAT0 119GB
110GB free
Firmware: 02.06M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 38.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 38.4
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 21%
Hitachi HTS543212L9SA02 120GB
98GB free
Firmware: FBBAC52F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 47.5
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 47.1
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 30%
Seagate Backup+ Desk Mac 3TB
2.5TB free, PID a0aa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 13.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 15.9
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
Seagate Backup+ Desk Mac 3TB
378GB free, PID a0aa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 24.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 17.3
33% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
79% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $972
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback