Asus X99-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 13 days ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 18:45
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
1-Core 118
2-Core 240
84% 179 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 719
75% 588 Pts
64-Core 904
61% 904 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Palit(1569 13C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 234
Reflection 197
Parallax 220
60% 217 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 207
Splatting 138
54% 166 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$170
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 418 414 417 404 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,426
Write 1362
Mixed 1,249
SusWrite 446
251% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 76
248% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 738
544% 718 MB/s
Poor: 222%
This bench: 193%
Great: 356%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 177 175 179 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 180
Mixed 29
SusWrite 178
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$46
248GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 112 109 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 174
Write 147
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 111
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2176 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 23
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 20.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $892
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback