Asus PRIME A320M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 13:56
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 186
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 312
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 38.2
37% 37.9 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 36.7
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 125 104 129 85 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1,460
Write 562
Mixed 137
SusWrite 121
123% 570 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 16.7
102% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.5
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 14.5
41% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 101%
Great: 191%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
19GB free
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 61 74 59 51 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 426
Write 125
Mixed 206
SusWrite 57.5
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 7.5
58% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 46.3
DQ Write 27.6
DQ Mixed 24.3
22% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
616GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 124
Write 116
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 124
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.CAGP7.40C0B 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $284
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback