Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics 3,779 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	20.7% Poor	Memory 35.3 1-Core 19.8 2-Core 38.2 21% 31.1 Pts	4-Core 36.3 8-Core 36.2 5% 36.2 Pts	64-Core 34.2 2% 34.2 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 7,644 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 22CD) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 1.69 1% 2.02 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.98 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 295 332 310 308 312 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.8% Average	Read 187 Write 21.1 Mixed 100 SusWrite 282 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 16 56% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 55.8 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 85 59% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 94%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 459GB free Firmware: AX001A Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 90.2 Mixed 36.5 47% 63.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16