PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus A68HM-K (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20181017 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 15 '19 at 06:08 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 140 96 36 25 284 MB/s
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
120GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 67 69 69 69 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 79x |
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples | 76x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 58x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 68x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 38x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |