Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 03:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 260
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 516
68% 513 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.7
19% 20.4 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.5
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 240GB-$76
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 37 48 39 45 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 322
Write 359
Mixed 316
SusWrite 44.5
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 5.5
49% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 24.3
DQ Mixed 15.2
13% 19 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 68%
Ccdisk iSCSI 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 29 35 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.2% Poor
Read 222
Write 102
Mixed 234
SusWrite 30
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 12.1
37% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 18.6
DQ Mixed 9.1
9% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 71%
Ccdisk iSCSI 250GB
187GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 35 47 39 45 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 238
Write 259
Mixed 138
SusWrite 43.3
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 9.4
42% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 6.4
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 6.5
6% 8.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback