Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '19 at 05:50
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	PYF-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 94.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 212 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 398 54% 405 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 113 Parallax 104 85% 107 fps	MRender 96.9 Gravity 100 Splatting 101 82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,377 Write 3,164 Mixed 3,651 898% 4,064 MB/s	4K Read 335 4K Write 216 4K Mixed 246 938% 266 MB/s	DQ Read 1,250 DQ Write 1,007 DQ Mixed 1,137 849% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 37GB free Firmware: 0002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 112 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 316 Write 130 Mixed 164 SusWrite 112 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 12.7 93% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 77.9 77% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 62%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 131GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 176 98 95 92 88 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 458 Mixed 392 SusWrite 169 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 95.8 4K Mixed 55.3 180% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 244 218% 329 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 126%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 138GB free Firmware: M0CR070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 158 158 158 158 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 350 Write 267 Mixed 278 SusWrite 158 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 62.8 4K Mixed 33.7 109% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 242 182% 244 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 104%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 15GB free Firmware: X41320RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 346 Write 277 Mixed 237 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 30.7 105% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 201 160% 225 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 107%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 82GB free Firmware: M0CR070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 165 166 167 166 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 346 Write 240 Mixed 194 SusWrite 167 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 33.4 107% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 161 122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 130GB free Firmware: M0CR070 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 156 157 157 159 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 348 Write 274 Mixed 278 SusWrite 157 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 33.7 106% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 245 183% 246 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 104%
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 0GB free Firmware: 300i Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 324 Write 144 Mixed 168 46% 212 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 33.5 109% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 106 90% 132 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 4,003 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.4% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 11 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 57.4 70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16