Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 351
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Device(105B 0DCC) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 95 95 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 468
Write 363
Mixed 349
SusWrite 134
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 29.6
110% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 210
186% 277 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 89%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
85GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 245 245 243 243 243 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.5% Very good
Read 255
Write 242
Mixed 240
SusWrite 244
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 38.6
123% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 196
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 128%
Mobile Drive 320GB
0GB free, PID fc24
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.3
Write 25
Mixed 18.2
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 36%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB
279GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 22.6
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 26.1
34% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 JM1333KLN-8GK CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 JM1333KLN-8GK 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $197
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback