PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140514 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '19 at 15:06 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 88 26 27 35 66 MB/s
|
93.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
121GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 299 298 298 297 298 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
282GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 130 129 126 125 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
660GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 87 87 87 88 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
86.1%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 528x |
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 272x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 181x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 122x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 116x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 112x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $1,163 |