TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 11:20
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 85
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 955
86% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,311
81% 1,311 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 88.5%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1652 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 91.2
Parallax 200
92% 135 fps
MRender 89.1
Gravity 140
Splatting 129
99% 119 fps
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 94.7%
 Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 317 309 319 296 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 479
Mixed 457
SusWrite 324
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 59
198% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 119%
 Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
870GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 450 438 456 438 457 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 458
Mixed 421
SusWrite 446
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 55.4
190% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 309
250% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 123%
 Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
459GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 159 164 158 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 77.5
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 161
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 91.9%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 32.6
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 30.3
94% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples1,175x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples748x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples643x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples323x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples282x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples225x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples207x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples147x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples134x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples357x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples204x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples168x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback