Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190621
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '19 at 10:10
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 184 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 654 62% 511 Pts	64-Core 1,002 62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Lighting 96.3 Reflection 87 Parallax 151 78% 111 fps	MRender 85.4 Gravity 103 Splatting 123 87% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 594GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1932 2011 1265 1035 1121 1117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	249% Outstanding	Read 2,270 Write 2070 Mixed 1,476 SusWrite 1,413 405% 1,807 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 58.3 191% 63.5 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 291 216% 280 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 249% Great: 372%
Crucial M500 960GB-$59 4,389 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 525GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 395 383 363 393 394 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 411 Write 400 Mixed 315 SusWrite 385 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 26.6 92% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 187 168% 252 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 101%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 126 126 125 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 224 Write 200 Mixed 100 SusWrite 125 119% 162 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.3 344% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 76%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 7TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 191 195 186 186 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 187 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 189 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.1 303% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 115%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 7TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 182 184 182 181 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 194 Mixed 95.7 SusWrite 184 121% 165 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 334% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 115%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 6TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 179 179 185 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 186 Mixed 92.7 SusWrite 182 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 307% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 115%
HGST Ultrastar He8 Helium 8TB-$94 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: A4GNW514 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 103 103 92 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 106 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 99 66% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.3 211% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 187GB free Firmware: JKAOA3GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 85 85 87 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 65.7 Write 68.3 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 85 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 4x16GB 889 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 33 101% 35.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 28.2 82% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	206x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	155x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $860

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16