Razer Blade Stealth

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Stealth  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Blade Stealth
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 09:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 89%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 137
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 324
38% 296 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 113
Parallax 128
105% 123 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 126
Splatting 100
102% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 325 324 319 322 323 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 936
Write 762
Mixed 533
SusWrite 350
144% 645 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65.6
220% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 910
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 641
504% 707 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 160%
Great: 236%
Ct2000mx 50 2TB
430GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 315 332 328 306 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63% Good
Read 302
Write 301
Mixed 290
SusWrite 319
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 24.6
79% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 158
117% 152 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Stealth Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Stealth

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback