Asrock 970 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Performance  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150319
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 01:35
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-8320E-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
44% Average
SC Int 64
SC Float 59.3
SC Mixed 62.3
50% 61.9 Pts
QC Int 219
QC Float 198
QC Mixed 212
48% 210 Pts
MC Int 388
MC Float 318
MC Mixed 347
53% 351 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 83.9
Parallax 130
34% 103 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 110
Splatting 75.7
41% 94 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 44%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$104
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 275 283 243 268 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 280
Write 350
Mixed 287
SusWrite 271
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 31.6
102% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 43.9
34% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$138
25GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 110 84 75 73 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 458
Write 400
Mixed 297
SusWrite 113
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 40.8
138% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 144
138% 216 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$25
203GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 74 78 73 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 79.9
Write 71.5
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 76.4
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 15.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 71%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical 970 Performance Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $395
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback