PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Performance (all builds) |
Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150319 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '19 at 01:35 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 275 283 243 268 278 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
25GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 110 84 75 73 59 MB/s
|
79.5%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
203GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 74 78 73 77 MB/s
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 20x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R7 370AMD $153Bench 21%, 39,178 samples | 3x |
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples | 3x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $311 |