MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '19 at 23:40
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 118 2-Core 209 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 720 68% 564 Pts	64-Core 1,118 69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 119 Parallax 111 91% 114 fps	MRender 99.4 Gravity 106 Splatting 107 86% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 829GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 361 396 433 395 402 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 410 Mixed 368 SusWrite 404 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 81.8 4K Mixed 46.8 150% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 286 232% 328 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 26GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.2 4.1 4.8 3.8 4.3 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	6.48% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 9.8 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.8 12% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.8 58% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.48% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.9 5.7 5.7 4.7 6.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.8% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 4.5 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 5.6 8% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.8% Great: 9%
hp v165g 8GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 5307 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Read 24.3 Write 3.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.4 9% 9.07 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 26GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 7.2 7.3 8.1 6.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 38.8 Write 35 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 11 28% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 53% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 2x8GB 546 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 44.6 MC Write 37.7 MC Mixed 35.3 112% 39.2 GB/s	SC Read 25.6 SC Write 38.3 SC Mixed 27.3 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	430x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	208x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	184x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	99x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	76x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	66x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	83x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	75x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $608

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)