Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190705
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '19 at 22:43
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 70.6 1-Core 150 2-Core 296 91% 172 Pts	4-Core 581 8-Core 1,012 96% 796 Pts	64-Core 1,406 87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 81 116 72 94 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 304 Write 202 Mixed 107 SusWrite 97 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 17.5 118% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 92.9 DQ Mixed 176 126% 164 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 105%
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB 7,130 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 65GB free Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 469 Write 265 Mixed 316 SusWrite 100 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 34.7 146% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 185 157% 229 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 450GB free Firmware: HP64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 67 67 67 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 107 Write 50.5 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 66.7 53% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 68%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 196GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 111 111 110 109 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 156 Write 154 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 110 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 104%
WD Elements 107C 5TB 1,675 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 163 163 163 163 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 127 Write 126 Mixed 87.7 SusWrite 163 173% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 824 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 351GB free, PID a00e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 104 103 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 99.5 Write 99.2 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 104 113% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 45%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 824 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 465GB free, PID a00e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 82 105 106 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 102 103% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 30,689 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.9% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 26.5 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 26.3 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,409x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,466x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $929

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16