Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '19 at 21:46
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 213 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 673 65% 537 Pts	64-Core 884 55% 884 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2378) CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Lighting 71.8 Reflection 69 Parallax 88.3 58% 76.4 fps	MRender 71 Gravity 73.2 Splatting 60 55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 479 Write 318 Mixed 309 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 36.8 125% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 115 92% 130 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Tcsunbow X3 240GB 3,491 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 223GB free Firmware: R1001A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 8.6 13 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 492 Write 41.2 Mixed 7 SusWrite 11.7 29% 138 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 0.7 50% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 4.4 DQ Mixed 0.3 20% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 116%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 225GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 122 122 122 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 115 Write 141 Mixed 64 SusWrite 122 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 330GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 107 108 107 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 109 Write 103 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 107 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 175GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 130 106 99 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 134 Write 114 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 106 68% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 81 81 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 89.2 Write 81.4 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 81.6 106% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.6 238% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE 1x8GB 357 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 18.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)