User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardPEGATRON 2A73h
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 19:21
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium E5800-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 84.6
41% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 104
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 102
7% 102 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$21
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 137 163 72 72 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.4% Poor
Read 184
Write 151
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 105
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 10.5
44% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 24.7
28% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.9 2.8 2.8 4.1 3.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 3.3
11% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
98% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $191Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $154Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $325Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback