HP 100-401ns

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 100-401ns  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B29
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 17:32
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Memory 15.9
1-Core 17.1
2-Core 21.5
12% 18.2 Pts
4-Core 26.5
8-Core 30.2
4% 28.4 Pts
64-Core 24.2
2% 24.2 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 2B29) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.69
1% 1.98 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 2.35
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 85 97 133 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 63
Write 150
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 96.9
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.91% Terrible
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 0.7
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 352
11% 352 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback