Asrock H55M-LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H55M-LE (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '19 at 16:47
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 76.9 2-Core 137 56% 94.1 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 190 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 340 185 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 1.84 4% 3.85 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.61 4% 4.51 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 193 Write 142 Mixed 124 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 15.3 72% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 42.7 DQ Mixed 23.9 20% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 29GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 46.3 Write 22.5 Mixed 32.8 26% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 40%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 121GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,855 Write 39.1 Mixed 67.4 708% 987 MB/s	4K Read 671 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.6 28,169% 225 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
USB Mass Storage Device 32GB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 168a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.8 7.5 6.4 6.9 6.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.9% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 4.3 Mixed 8.6 SusWrite 6.9 11% 9.88 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 12.8 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55M-LE Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M-LE

CPU
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	68x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	45x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	39x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	39x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
ARC 100 240GBOCZ $120Bench 87%, 11,799 samples	6x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	175x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	56x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $88

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16