ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '15 at 14:23
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$220 29,689 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 71.8 2-Core 135 49% 103 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 425 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 426 29% 426 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,183 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 0483) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.200.0.0 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.16 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.78 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 18,236 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3366 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2020 (E8) Unknown 100 100 13409417652 (E9) Unknown 98 0 98	55.3% Above average	Read 315 Write 313 Mixed 249 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 15.8 69% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 17 26% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 105%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 59,579 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 407GB free Firmware: GG2OACA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 214 100 51539607553 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 386 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1433 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 384 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 131072 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 51 454819868 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 112 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 720907 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 73358 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	55.5% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 97.1 Mixed 55.8 62% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.17 69% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $160

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 67%, 330,237 samples	783x
FX-6300AMD $80Bench 61%, 271,127 samples	766x
FX-8320AMD $244Bench 64%, 110,897 samples	409x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 870,997 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,300,415 samples	151x
RX 580AMD $260Bench 55%, 787,457 samples	141x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $30Bench 66%, 390,171 samples	112x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 104%, 849,566 samples	101x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $81Bench 54%, 349,805 samples	89x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 114,423 samples	94x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 55%, 40,924 samples	77x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 39,196 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $475

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $334	Nvidia RTX 3050 $250	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback