Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '15 at 14:16
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 124
44% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 396
38% 314 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 0483) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.200.0.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.16 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 1.87
2% 1.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 348
Write 359
Mixed 271
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 16
74% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 16.7
27% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
407GB free
Firmware: GG2OACA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 100
Mixed 54.4
62% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.17
71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56%
Great: 58%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB
8GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 10.8
Mixed 9.26
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.22
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.006
16% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 8%
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback