| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 510-p102nf (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 81B4 |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160824 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '19 at 14:53 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
61.9%
Good
|
57% 94.9 Pts
|
31% 226 Pts
|
16% 262 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
HP(103C 82DF) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.9%
Poor
|
22% 28.1 fps
|
24% 29.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 53 33 68 84 83 MB/s
|
70% 96.3 MB/s
|
131% 1.07 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.7%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
53% 75.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 510-p102nf Builds (Compare 19 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 510-p102nf
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 11x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $148 |