Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120821
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '19 at 14:07
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	80%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 84 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 168 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 250 24% 198 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.3% Above average	Lighting 74.1 Reflection 74.2 Parallax 63.9 60% 70.7 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 71.3 57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460 240GB-$203 1,730 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 310 359 330 327 252 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 318 Write 348 Mixed 271 SusWrite 300 70% 309 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 29 102% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 37.8 39% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 647GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 118 118 118 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 105 Write 101 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 117 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.1 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77-DS3H Builds (Compare 999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	288x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	141x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	29x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	27x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16