Asrock H61M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '19 at 13:59
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 177 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 457 49% 391 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.7% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 113 Parallax 107 93% 111 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 98 Splatting 84.1 84% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: P180509a SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 83 83 68 84 83 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.5% Below average	Read 210 Write 139 Mixed 112 SusWrite 77.4 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 20.9 74% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 24 DQ Write 40.2 DQ Mixed 26.6 22% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 99%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 130GB free Firmware: 1AN10003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 68 68 68 68 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	42% Average	Read 78.3 Write 34.5 Mixed 48 SusWrite 67.8 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 192GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 69 71 71 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 46.7 Write 71.2 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 69.7 41% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX 029E CM3X8GA1600C11V2 16GB 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-HVS Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVS - $64

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	52x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	43x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	32x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	72x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $389

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16